Action taken on 'cartel' unions
The consumer watchdog is taking the CFMEU to court over claims the union engaged in boycott conduct directed at concrete company Boral.
The ACCC alleges that between February 2013 and April 2014, the Construction Forestry Mining and Energy Union (CFMEU) instructed shop stewards to ban the use of Boral concrete at construction sites in Melbourne.
Shop stewards allegedly told customers that on certain commercial sites Boral concrete was not permitted.
The ACCC also says the union-backed stewards told potential customers that safety checks on Boral concrete trucks, causing significant delays, would have to be conducted if a customer wanted to use Boral concrete.
The ACCC will also allege:
- the CFMEU, Mr John Setka, the Secretary of the Victoria – Tasmania Branch and Mr Shaun Reardon, the Assistant Secretary of the CFMEU-VIC, attempted to induce Boral to enter into a contract, arrangement or understanding not to supply concrete to Grocon; and
- the CFMEU, through conduct of Mr Setka and Mr Reardon, engaged in undue harassment or coercion of Boral in relation to the supply of concrete
The Court will hear that the CFMEU has been in dispute with Grocon for several years.
The dispute has seen CFMEU-initiated work stoppages and picketing at certain Grocon construction sites.
In response, Grocon has taken its own proceedings seeking injunctions and damages.
Boral is Grocon’s exclusive concrete supplier. It is alleged that, as a result of Boral continuing to supply Grocon with concrete during the CFMEU’s dispute with Grocon, the CFMEU targeted Boral by banning it from supplying concrete on metropolitan Melbourne commercial construction sites.
“These proceedings relate to complex allegations of conduct spanning a 14 month period ending in April 2014, and occurring at 12 commercial construction sites,” ACCC Chairman Rod Sims said.
“The ACCC considers unions have an important role in protecting the rights of workers and ensuring safe and productive work places.”
The case is linked to findings from the Federal Government’s Royal Commission into Trade Union Governance and Corruption.
Prominent Australian business writer Robert Gottliebson says the case “is only the tip of a very expensive iceberg involving the relationship between large corporations in the building industry and powerful unions”.
“Under the cartel-style arrangements between unions and big builders the unions approve which groups can be subcontractors.
“The enormous cash balances which exist in many unions makes me believe that there is at least at prima facie case that some subcontracts pay the unions for the right to be able to tender.”
“Previously, we saw Toll pay the unions and in exchange the unions investigated Toll’s competitors and reported back to Toll.
“Part of the problem is that executives in too many large Australian companies have achieved their positions because of their ability to do these sorts of deal with unions.
“If the deals can’t be done, and the companies have to compete openly, then different styles of executives are required,” he said.